Comparisons

TFZ No.3 vs TFZ Queen

The Queen has more sub-bass quantity than the Queen and it commands greater extension. The rumble on the Queen is stronger. The bass texture on the Queen is rendered with additional smoothness. The bass decay on the No.3 is quicker and the nimbleness contributes to the overall engagement level. There is more mid-bass quantity on the Queen and it creates a denser feeling. Each bass note on the No.3 is articulated with more precision. The midrange of the Queen is thicker than the No.3 and vocals take on a full-bodied approach. The The lower midrange on the Queen has more quantity and male vocals are expressed in a lusher manner. The upper midrange on the No.3 is more vivid and the liveliness creates an energetic female vocals. The transparency level on the No.3 is higher while the Queen has a rich midrange. In the treble department, the No.3 has better extension and it is able to provide an airier feeling. The crisp is more defined. There is more treble body on the Queen and the expression can be subdued at times. The No.3 gives a lighter feeling that is more relaxing. Lastly, in terms of soundstage, there is a more natural expansion with the No.3. The width magnitude is greater on the No.3 and the depth of the Queen is more closed in.

TFZ No.3 vs iBasso IT01

The IT01 has more sub-bass quantity than the No.3 and the extension is greater . The sub-bass reproduction on the IT01 is able to provide stronger rumble. The bass decay on the No.3 is quicker with agility. Bass texture on the IT01 is rendered smoother. The mid-bass on the IT01 has additional body which contributes to a fuller slam. Each bass note on the IT01 is articulated with more punch. The is a more impactful bass performance from the IT01. The midrange on the No.3 is expressed in clearer manner. The transparency level on the No.3 is slightly higher. The lower midrange on the IT01 has more body and male vocals sound thicker but with reduced presence. The upper midrange on the No.3 is boosted and the additional forwardness results in a more engaging female vocals presentation. The treble on the No.3 has better extension and it is able to render greater amount of air. The crisp has better definition on the No.3 with the additional sparkle injecting energy at the top end which creates a more vibrant treble expression. The treble on both is generally smooth but No.3 has the slight edge for clarity. Lastly,  the soundstage expansion on both is natural. The No.3 has greater width magnitude and the depth on IT01 is more closed in.

photo_2019-04-12_23-13-30

Page 5: Conclusion