Comparisons
TFZ My Love III vs TFZ King Pro
The My Love III has more sub-bass quantity than the King Pro and there is greater extension on the King Pro The sub-bass reproduction on the King Pro is expressed in a tighter manner. The bass decay on the King Pro is slightly quicker. The bass texture on the My Love III is rendered smoothly. The mid-bass on the My Love III is presented with a weighted slam. There is a full-bodied and unoffensive display on the My Love III. Each bass note on the King Pro is articulated with a clinical hit and there is a higher level of authority. The midrange on the My Love III is more full-bodied and vocals are expressed in a smoother manner. The King Pro has better clarity with higher transparency level. The lower midrange on the My Love III has more body than the King Pro and male vocals are expressed in a thicker manner but with slightly reduced presence. The upper midrange on the King Pro has stronger emphasis and the boost contributes to a livelier female vocals listen. Next, for the treble, the King Pro has better extension and the crisp has greater definition. There is an airier feeling on the King Pro with a higher level of vibrancy. The My Love III takes on a smoother and relaxing expression with no harshness. For the soundstage, there is a natural expansion for both and the King Pro has greater width magnitude. The depth on both is quite similar.
TFZ My Love III vs Anew U1
The My Love III has more sub-bass quantity than the U1 and the U1 has better extension. There is a stronger rumble on the U1. The My Love III takes on a smoother manner. The bass decay on the U1 is quicker with more agility. The bass texture rendered on the My Love III has an edge with extra smoothness. The My Love III has a thicker mid-bass and the slam is expressed in a less punchy manner than the U1. There is a more relaxing bass expression on the My Love III. Each bass note on the U1 is articulated with extra strength. The midrange on the My Love III is expressed in a smoother manner and vocals are conveyed with body. The U1 has a leaner and brighter presentation with a higher level of clarity. The lower midrange on the My Love III has more body and male vocals are presented in a lusher expression but with reduced presence. The upper midrange on the U1 is more boosted and female vocals are presented with more energy which contributes to a captivating listen. For the treble section, the U1 has more extension than the My Love III and there is a greater amount of air rendered. The treble on the My Love III has more body and it takes on a smoother approach for a fatigue-free listen. The crisp on the U1 is more defined with extra sparkle. Lastly, for the soundstage, the expansion on both is natural while the U1 has greater width magnitude. The depth on the My Love III is slightly more closed in.
Hello, thanks for your review. How would you compare this IEM to Tequila 1?
LikeLike
My Love III is smoother and darker than the Tequila 1. Cheers!
LikeLike
Good review! Wich is better, this, or the TFZ no.3 TI?
LikeLike
TFZ No.3 Ti definitely. Cheers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Was just lucky to get these half price. Needed a few days burn in. Reminded me of pre-digital sound. Very analogue, and from a darker background. Although the bass is good, the tuning focuses on the lush mid-range. Highs are there but don’t stand out. Bass is there but not the point of these IEMs. TFZ claim a HiFi sound and with the exceptional clarity have achieved that. Plugged into my micro valve amp they take me on a trip to early Arcam and Musical Fidelity. A real treat for nostalgic memories of us older folk who sat listening to vinyl in the old days in sparsely furnished rooms. For vocal lovers this IEM is a treat. Not for those obsessed with detail, but beautiful old fashioned, organic sound
LikeLike
Glad you enjoy the TFZ My Love III. Cheers!
LikeLike