Comparisons

Campfire Polaris II vs Earsonics Blade

The Polaris II has more sub-bass quantity than the Blade and the Polaris II boasts greater extension. The sub-bass reproduction on the Polaris has a higher level of authority and there is an impactful rumble. The mid-bass on the Polaris II has more body than the Blade and the slam takes on a bolder presentation. The bass decay on the Polaris II is slightly quicker and there is a more agile expression. The bass texture on both is rendered with smoothness. Each bass note on the Polaris II is articulated with greater impact. The midrange on the Blade is presented in a soothing manner and it has higher level of musicality. The lower midrange on the Polaris II has a little more body which results in a thicker expression but the Blade delivers male vocals with additional presence. The upper midrange on the Blade has greater emphasis and the extra boost contributes to a more intimate female vocals presentation. The Blade is able to deliver a more upfront midrange. For the treble section, the Polaris II commands greater extension than the Blade with more precise articulation. The crisp on the Polaris II has better definition and there is additional sparkle. The amount of air rendered on both is quite similar. The treble expression on the Blade has more body and there is a smooth listen with no harshness. Lastly, for the soundstage, the Polaris II has a more natural expansion with greater width magnitude. The depth of the Polaris II is more closed in.

Campfire Polaris II vs Dunu DK-3001 Pro

The Polaris II has more sub-bass quantity than the DK-3001 Pro and the Polaris II  commands greater extension. The sub-bass reproduction on the Polaris II provides a stronger rumble. The mid-bass on the Polaris II has more body than the DK-3001 Pro and the slam is being delivered in a bolder manner. The bass decay on the Polaris II is quicker. The bass texture on both is rendered smoothly. Each bass note on the Polaris II is articulated with an impactful hit. The midrange on the DK-3001 Pro is more musical than the Polaris II and vocals are more forward. The transparency level on both is quite similar. The lower midrange on the DK-3001 Pro is fuller than the Polaris II and male vocals are expressed with additional presence. Emotions are conveyed well on the DK-3001 Pro. The upper midrange on the DK-3001 Pro is more forward and the boost elevates the intimacy level of female vocals. There is a smoother and more present vocals expression on the DK-3001 Pro. For the treble section, the Polaris II has slightly better extension with greater amount of air rendered. The crisp on the Polaris II is defined and there is additional sparkle. The treble expression on the DK-3001 Pro has more body and there is a smoother presentation. Lastly, for the soundstage, the DK-3001 Pro has slightly more natural expansion with greater width magnitude. The Polaris II is able to render more depth.

photo_2020-02-26_22-50-53

Page 5: Conclusion